Australia vs Thailand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Australia
0 current US$
in 2020
Thailand
0.0017 current US$
in 2017
Australia rank
16th
Thailand rank
15th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Australia
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 0.0017 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Australia, a difference of 0.0017 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Thailand ahead.
Australia ranks 16th and Thailand ranks 15th of 41 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 57.77 current US$ | 0.0292 current US$ | 57.74 current US$ | Australia |
| 2010s | 97.64 current US$ | 0.1157 current US$ | 97.53 current US$ | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Australia or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 0.0017 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Australia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Australia and Thailand?
- 0.0017 current US$, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Thailand?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
- How do Australia and Thailand rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Australia ranks 16th and Thailand ranks 15th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.