Australia vs Saudi Arabia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Australia
0 current US$
in 2020
Saudi Arabia
0 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
16th
Saudi Arabia rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Australia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 16th and Saudi Arabia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 244.75 current US$ | 13.12 current US$ | 231.63 current US$ | Australia |
| 2010s | 49.63 current US$ | 71.36 current US$ | 21.72 current US$ | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Australia or Saudi Arabia?
- Australia, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Saudi Arabia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Australia and Saudi Arabia?
- 0 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Saudi Arabia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Australia ranks 16th and Saudi Arabia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.