Australia vs Iraq: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Australia
0 current US$
in 2020
Iraq
0 current US$
in 2014
Australia rank
16th
Iraq rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Australia
- Iraq
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Iraq, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Iraq ahead.
Australia ranks 16th and Iraq ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 57.77 current US$ | 0.4067 current US$ | 57.36 current US$ | Australia |
| 2010s | 99.27 current US$ | 5.03 current US$ | 94.24 current US$ | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Australia or Iraq?
- Australia, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Iraq as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Australia and Iraq?
- 0 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Iraq?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Iraq rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Australia ranks 16th and Iraq ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.