Australia vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel

Australia
752.6 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
304.38 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Australia rank
1st
Papua New Guinea rank
3rd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel over time

  • Australia
  • Papua New Guinea
02505007501.0k1.2k199520072020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 752.6 real chained 2019 US$ against 304.38 real chained 2019 US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 448.22 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Australia's figure about 2.5 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Australia ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 3rd of 144 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 308.82 real chained 2019 US$ 732.62 real chained 2019 US$ 423.8 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 1,117 real chained 2019 US$ 570.77 real chained 2019 US$ 546.31 real chained 2019 US$ Australia
2010s 797.29 real chained 2019 US$ 407.19 real chained 2019 US$ 390.1 real chained 2019 US$ Australia
2020s 752.6 real chained 2019 US$ 304.38 real chained 2019 US$ 448.22 real chained 2019 US$ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel, Australia or Papua New Guinea?
Australia, at 752.6 real chained 2019 US$ against 304.38 real chained 2019 US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel between Australia and Papua New Guinea?
448.22 real chained 2019 US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel?
Australia ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 3rd of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel. Statizoid. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-nickel-real-chained-2019-us/australia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-nickel-real-chained-2019-us/australia/papua-new-guinea/">Australia vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,703 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed