South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel

South Africa
82.68 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
96.42 current US$
in 2020
South Africa rank
12th
Zimbabwe rank
10th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300400199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 96.42 current US$ against 82.68 current US$ in South Africa, a difference of 13.74 current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 10th of 26 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 53.65 current US$ 36.71 current US$ 16.93 current US$ South Africa
2000s 167.44 current US$ 4.22 current US$ 163.22 current US$ South Africa
2010s 120.33 current US$ 68.18 current US$ 52.14 current US$ South Africa
2020s 82.68 current US$ 96.42 current US$ 13.74 current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel, South Africa or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 96.42 current US$ against 82.68 current US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
13.74 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel?
South Africa ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 10th of 26 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-nickel-current-us/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-nickel-current-us/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
26 places, 530 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed