Kazakhstan vs Spain: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel
Kazakhstan
0.3149 current US$
in 2012
Spain
2.27 current US$
in 2015
Kazakhstan rank
19th
Spain rank
17th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel over time
- Kazakhstan
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 2.27 current US$ against 0.3149 current US$ in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.96 current US$.
That makes Spain's figure about 7.2 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 19th and Spain ranks 17th of 26 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.96 current US$ | 7.02 current US$ | 5.06 current US$ | Spain |
| 2010s | 0.2921 current US$ | 0.9546 current US$ | 0.6625 current US$ | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel, Kazakhstan or Spain?
- Spain, at 2.27 current US$ against 0.3149 current US$ in Kazakhstan as of 2015.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel between Kazakhstan and Spain?
- 1.96 current US$, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Spain?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do Kazakhstan and Spain rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel?
- Kazakhstan ranks 19th and Spain ranks 17th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.