Kazakhstan vs Norway: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel
Kazakhstan
0.3149 current US$
in 2012
Norway
0 current US$
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
19th
Norway rank
21st
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel over time
- Kazakhstan
- Norway
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.3149 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Norway, a difference of 0.3149 current US$.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 19th and Norway ranks 21st of 26 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 1.23 current US$ | 3.75 current US$ | 2.52 current US$ | Norway |
| 2010s | 0.3817 current US$ | 0.6537 current US$ | 0.272 current US$ | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel, Kazakhstan or Norway?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.3149 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Norway as of 2012.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel between Kazakhstan and Norway?
- 0.3149 current US$, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Norway?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2012.
- How do Kazakhstan and Norway rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel?
- Kazakhstan ranks 19th and Norway ranks 21st of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.