Finland vs Madagascar: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel
Finland
170.27 current US$
in 2020
Madagascar
136.9 current US$
in 2020
Finland rank
7th
Madagascar rank
9th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel over time
- Finland
- Madagascar
How they compare
Finland currently reports 170.27 current US$ against 136.9 current US$ in Madagascar, a difference of 33.37 current US$.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.2 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Madagascar ahead.
Finland ranks 7th and Madagascar ranks 9th of 26 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 118.26 current US$ | 40.9 current US$ | 77.36 current US$ | Finland |
| 2020s | 170.27 current US$ | 136.9 current US$ | 33.38 current US$ | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel, Finland or Madagascar?
- Finland, at 170.27 current US$ against 136.9 current US$ in Madagascar as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel between Finland and Madagascar?
- 33.37 current US$, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Madagascar?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Madagascar rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel?
- Finland ranks 7th and Madagascar ranks 9th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.