China vs Spain: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel
China
9.7 current US$
in 2020
Spain
2.27 current US$
in 2015
China rank
15th
Spain rank
17th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel over time
- China
- Spain
How they compare
China currently reports 9.7 current US$ against 2.27 current US$ in Spain, a difference of 7.43 current US$.
That makes China's figure about 4.3 times Spain's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was China ahead.
China ranks 15th and Spain ranks 17th of 26 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.74 current US$ | 7.02 current US$ | 3.72 current US$ | China |
| 2010s | 10.71 current US$ | 2.07 current US$ | 8.64 current US$ | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel, China or Spain?
- China, at 9.7 current US$ against 2.27 current US$ in Spain as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel between China and Spain?
- 7.43 current US$, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Spain?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do China and Spain rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel?
- China ranks 15th and Spain ranks 17th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.