Australia vs Guatemala: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel
Australia
499.39 current US$
in 2020
Guatemala
342.33 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
1st
Guatemala rank
3rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel over time
- Australia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Australia currently reports 499.39 current US$ against 342.33 current US$ in Guatemala, a difference of 157.06 current US$.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.5 times Guatemala's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 1st and Guatemala ranks 3rd of 26 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 807.18 current US$ | 63.14 current US$ | 744.05 current US$ | Australia |
| 2020s | 499.39 current US$ | 342.33 current US$ | 157.05 current US$ | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel, Australia or Guatemala?
- Australia, at 499.39 current US$ against 342.33 current US$ in Guatemala as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel between Australia and Guatemala?
- 157.06 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Guatemala?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Guatemala rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel?
- Australia ranks 1st and Guatemala ranks 3rd of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: nickel (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.