Brazil vs China: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium

Brazil
0.8183 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
China
0.3236 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
5th
China rank
6th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium over time

  • Brazil
  • China
00.511.52199520072020

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.8183 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.3236 real chained 2019 US$ in China, a difference of 0.4947 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Brazil's figure about 2.5 times China's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was China ahead.

Brazil ranks 5th and China ranks 6th of 146 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil China Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0099 real chained 2019 US$ 0.1362 real chained 2019 US$ 0.1263 real chained 2019 US$ China
2000s 1.57 real chained 2019 US$ 0.1944 real chained 2019 US$ 1.37 real chained 2019 US$ Brazil
2010s 0.5302 real chained 2019 US$ 0.6035 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0733 real chained 2019 US$ China
2020s 0.8183 real chained 2019 US$ 0.3236 real chained 2019 US$ 0.4946 real chained 2019 US$ Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium, Brazil or China?
Brazil, at 0.8183 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.3236 real chained 2019 US$ in China as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium between Brazil and China?
0.4947 real chained 2019 US$, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Brazil and China rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium?
Brazil ranks 5th and China ranks 6th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs China: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium. Statizoid. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-lithium-real-chained-2019-us/brazil/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-lithium-real-chained-2019-us/brazil/china/">Brazil vs China: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
146 places, 3,755 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed