Argentina vs Chile: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium

Argentina
15.16 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chile
103.98 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Argentina rank
3rd
Chile rank
2nd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium over time

  • Argentina
  • Chile
020406080100199520072020

How they compare

Chile currently reports 103.98 real chained 2019 US$ against 15.16 real chained 2019 US$ in Argentina, a difference of 88.82 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Chile's figure about 6.9 times Argentina's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 3rd and Chile ranks 2nd of 146 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 7.1 real chained 2019 US$ 39.08 real chained 2019 US$ 31.97 real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2000s 6.54 real chained 2019 US$ 52.42 real chained 2019 US$ 45.88 real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2010s 10.85 real chained 2019 US$ 95.45 real chained 2019 US$ 84.6 real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2020s 15.16 real chained 2019 US$ 103.98 real chained 2019 US$ 88.82 real chained 2019 US$ Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium, Argentina or Chile?
Chile, at 103.98 real chained 2019 US$ against 15.16 real chained 2019 US$ in Argentina as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium between Argentina and Chile?
88.82 real chained 2019 US$, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Chile?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Argentina and Chile rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium?
Argentina ranks 3rd and Chile ranks 2nd of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Chile: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium. Statizoid. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-lithium-real-chained-2019-us/argentina/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-lithium-real-chained-2019-us/argentina/chile/">Argentina vs Chile: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lithium (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
146 places, 3,755 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed