Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tajikistan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead

Bosnia and Herzegovina
16.92 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Tajikistan
26.75 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
13th
Tajikistan rank
11th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Tajikistan
2030405060199520072020

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 26.75 real chained 2019 US$ against 16.92 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 9.83 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.6 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 13th and Tajikistan ranks 11th of 140 countries.

Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s 20.78 real chained 2019 US$ 61.92 real chained 2019 US$ 41.15 real chained 2019 US$ Tajikistan
2000s 19.94 real chained 2019 US$ 54.61 real chained 2019 US$ 34.68 real chained 2019 US$ Tajikistan
2010s 19.03 real chained 2019 US$ 39.7 real chained 2019 US$ 20.67 real chained 2019 US$ Tajikistan
2020s 16.92 real chained 2019 US$ 26.75 real chained 2019 US$ 9.83 real chained 2019 US$ Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at 26.75 real chained 2019 US$ against 16.92 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tajikistan?
9.83 real chained 2019 US$, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tajikistan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tajikistan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 13th and Tajikistan ranks 11th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tajikistan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead. Statizoid. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-lead-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-lead-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tajikistan/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tajikistan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 3,599 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed