South Africa vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead
South Africa
5.23 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
5.16 current US$
in 2005
South Africa rank
22nd
Tunisia rank
23rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead over time
- South Africa
- Tunisia
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 5.23 current US$ against 5.16 current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 0.07 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 22nd and Tunisia ranks 23rd of 51 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.6 current US$ | 3.02 current US$ | 6.57 current US$ | South Africa |
| 2000s | 1.82 current US$ | 2.18 current US$ | 0.3617 current US$ | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead, South Africa or Tunisia?
- South Africa, at 5.23 current US$ against 5.16 current US$ in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead between South Africa and Tunisia?
- 0.07 current US$, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Tunisia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2005.
- How do South Africa and Tunisia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead?
- South Africa ranks 22nd and Tunisia ranks 23rd of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.