Russian Federation vs Tajikistan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead

Russian Federation
30.31 current US$
in 2020
Tajikistan
30.56 current US$
in 2020
Russian Federation rank
11th
Tajikistan rank
10th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Tajikistan
0204060199520072020

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 30.56 current US$ against 30.31 current US$ in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.25 current US$.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 11th and Tajikistan ranks 10th of 51 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.7091 current US$ 0.8057 current US$ 0.0967 current US$ Tajikistan
2000s 3.94 current US$ 1.61 current US$ 2.32 current US$ Russian Federation
2010s 19.3 current US$ 36.9 current US$ 17.6 current US$ Tajikistan
2020s 30.31 current US$ 30.56 current US$ 0.2526 current US$ Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead, Russian Federation or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at 30.56 current US$ against 30.31 current US$ in Russian Federation as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead between Russian Federation and Tajikistan?
0.25 current US$, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Tajikistan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Russian Federation and Tajikistan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead?
Russian Federation ranks 11th and Tajikistan ranks 10th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Tajikistan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/russian-federation/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/russian-federation/tajikistan/">Russian Federation vs Tajikistan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 1,007 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed