Poland vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead
Poland
3.66 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
5.16 current US$
in 2005
Poland rank
26th
Tunisia rank
23rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead over time
- Poland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 5.16 current US$ against 3.66 current US$ in Poland, a difference of 1.5 current US$.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.4 times Poland's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 26th and Tunisia ranks 23rd of 51 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.19 current US$ | 3.02 current US$ | 4.17 current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 7.36 current US$ | 2.18 current US$ | 5.17 current US$ | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead, Poland or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 5.16 current US$ against 3.66 current US$ in Poland as of 2005.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead between Poland and Tunisia?
- 1.5 current US$, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Tunisia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2005.
- How do Poland and Tunisia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead?
- Poland ranks 26th and Tunisia ranks 23rd of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.