Peru vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead
Peru
35.07 current US$
in 2020
Sweden
45.22 current US$
in 2020
Peru rank
7th
Sweden rank
4th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead over time
- Peru
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 45.22 current US$ against 35.07 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 10.15 current US$.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.3 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 7th and Sweden ranks 4th of 51 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.22 current US$ | 14.56 current US$ | 4.66 current US$ | Peru |
| 2000s | 68.07 current US$ | 40.29 current US$ | 27.77 current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 107.16 current US$ | 90.17 current US$ | 16.99 current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 35.07 current US$ | 45.22 current US$ | 10.16 current US$ | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead, Peru or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 45.22 current US$ against 35.07 current US$ in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead between Peru and Sweden?
- 10.15 current US$, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Sweden?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Peru and Sweden rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead?
- Peru ranks 7th and Sweden ranks 4th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.