Namibia vs Russian Federation: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead

Namibia
19.65 current US$
in 2020
Russian Federation
30.31 current US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
14th
Russian Federation rank
11th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead over time

  • Namibia
  • Russian Federation
050100150199520072020

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 30.31 current US$ against 19.65 current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 10.66 current US$.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.5 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 14th and Russian Federation ranks 11th of 51 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 38.94 current US$ 0.7091 current US$ 38.23 current US$ Namibia
2000s 59.42 current US$ 3.94 current US$ 55.48 current US$ Namibia
2010s 46.28 current US$ 19.3 current US$ 26.98 current US$ Namibia
2020s 19.65 current US$ 30.31 current US$ 10.66 current US$ Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead, Namibia or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 30.31 current US$ against 19.65 current US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead between Namibia and Russian Federation?
10.66 current US$, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Russian Federation?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Namibia and Russian Federation rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead?
Namibia ranks 14th and Russian Federation ranks 11th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Russian Federation: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead. Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/namibia/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/namibia/russian-federation/">Namibia vs Russian Federation: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 1,007 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed