Ecuador vs Thailand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead
Ecuador
0.0362 current US$
in 2001
Thailand
0.0977 current US$
in 2002
Ecuador rank
46th
Thailand rank
44th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead over time
- Ecuador
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 0.0977 current US$ against 0.0362 current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0615 current US$.
That makes Thailand's figure about 2.7 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Thailand ahead.
Ecuador ranks 46th and Thailand ranks 44th of 51 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0803 current US$ | 0.5821 current US$ | 0.5018 current US$ | Thailand |
| 2000s | 0.0433 current US$ | 0.133 current US$ | 0.0897 current US$ | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead, Ecuador or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 0.0977 current US$ against 0.0362 current US$ in Ecuador as of 2002.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead between Ecuador and Thailand?
- 0.0615 current US$, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Thailand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2001.
- How do Ecuador and Thailand rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead?
- Ecuador ranks 46th and Thailand ranks 44th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.