Ecuador vs Japan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead
Ecuador
0.0362 current US$
in 2001
Japan
0.0861 current US$
in 2006
Ecuador rank
46th
Japan rank
45th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead over time
- Ecuador
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0.0861 current US$ against 0.0362 current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0499 current US$.
That makes Japan's figure about 2.4 times Ecuador's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 46th and Japan ranks 45th of 51 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0803 current US$ | 0.1712 current US$ | 0.0909 current US$ | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.0433 current US$ | 0.0579 current US$ | 0.0146 current US$ | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead, Ecuador or Japan?
- Japan, at 0.0861 current US$ against 0.0362 current US$ in Ecuador as of 2006.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead between Ecuador and Japan?
- 0.0499 current US$, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Japan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2001.
- How do Ecuador and Japan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead?
- Ecuador ranks 46th and Japan ranks 45th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.