Chile vs Spain: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead
Chile
0.3046 current US$
in 2020
Spain
0.8849 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
35th
Spain rank
32nd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead over time
- Chile
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 0.8849 current US$ against 0.3046 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 0.5803 current US$.
That makes Spain's figure about 2.9 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Spain ahead.
Chile ranks 35th and Spain ranks 32nd of 51 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3476 current US$ | 1.88 current US$ | 1.53 current US$ | Spain |
| 2000s | 0.2426 current US$ | 0.7014 current US$ | 0.4588 current US$ | Spain |
| 2010s | 0.2096 current US$ | 1.77 current US$ | 1.56 current US$ | Spain |
| 2020s | 0.3046 current US$ | 0.8849 current US$ | 0.5803 current US$ | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead, Chile or Spain?
- Spain, at 0.8849 current US$ against 0.3046 current US$ in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead between Chile and Spain?
- 0.5803 current US$, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Spain?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Spain rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead?
- Chile ranks 35th and Spain ranks 32nd of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.