Chile vs Pakistan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead
Chile
0.3046 current US$
in 2020
Pakistan
0.2661 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
35th
Pakistan rank
37th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead over time
- Chile
- Pakistan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.3046 current US$ against 0.2661 current US$ in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0385 current US$.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 35th and Pakistan ranks 37th of 51 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2096 current US$ | 0.2649 current US$ | 0.0552 current US$ | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.3046 current US$ | 0.2661 current US$ | 0.0386 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead, Chile or Pakistan?
- Chile, at 0.3046 current US$ against 0.2661 current US$ in Pakistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead between Chile and Pakistan?
- 0.0385 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Pakistan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Pakistan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead?
- Chile ranks 35th and Pakistan ranks 37th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.