Chile vs Nigeria: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead
Chile
0.3046 current US$
in 2020
Nigeria
0.7635 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
35th
Nigeria rank
33rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead over time
- Chile
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 0.7635 current US$ against 0.3046 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 0.4589 current US$.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 2.5 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 35th and Nigeria ranks 33rd of 51 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.7006 current US$ | 0.9365 current US$ | 0.2359 current US$ | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 0.2096 current US$ | 1.39 current US$ | 1.18 current US$ | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 0.3046 current US$ | 0.7635 current US$ | 0.4589 current US$ | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead, Chile or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 0.7635 current US$ against 0.3046 current US$ in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead between Chile and Nigeria?
- 0.4589 current US$, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nigeria?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Nigeria rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead?
- Chile ranks 35th and Nigeria ranks 33rd of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.