Bulgaria vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead
Bulgaria
34.02 current US$
in 2020
Peru
35.07 current US$
in 2020
Bulgaria rank
8th
Peru rank
7th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead over time
- Bulgaria
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 35.07 current US$ against 34.02 current US$ in Bulgaria, a difference of 1.05 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Bulgaria ranks 8th and Peru ranks 7th of 51 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.77 current US$ | 19.22 current US$ | 4.46 current US$ | Peru |
| 2000s | 24.74 current US$ | 68.07 current US$ | 43.33 current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 43.31 current US$ | 107.16 current US$ | 63.85 current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 34.02 current US$ | 35.07 current US$ | 1.05 current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead, Bulgaria or Peru?
- Peru, at 35.07 current US$ against 34.02 current US$ in Bulgaria as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead between Bulgaria and Peru?
- 1.05 current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Bulgaria and Peru rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead?
- Bulgaria ranks 8th and Peru ranks 7th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.