Brazil vs Thailand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead
Brazil
0.0995 current US$
in 2020
Thailand
0.0977 current US$
in 2002
Brazil rank
43rd
Thailand rank
44th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead over time
- Brazil
- Thailand
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0.0995 current US$ against 0.0977 current US$ in Thailand, a difference of 0.0018 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Thailand ahead.
Brazil ranks 43rd and Thailand ranks 44th of 51 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3734 current US$ | 0.6101 current US$ | 0.2367 current US$ | Thailand |
| 2000s | 0.1704 current US$ | 0.1213 current US$ | 0.0492 current US$ | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead, Brazil or Thailand?
- Brazil, at 0.0995 current US$ against 0.0977 current US$ in Thailand as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead between Brazil and Thailand?
- 0.0018 current US$, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Thailand?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2002.
- How do Brazil and Thailand rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead?
- Brazil ranks 43rd and Thailand ranks 44th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.