Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead

Bosnia and Herzegovina
9.94 current US$
in 2020
Mexico
15.01 current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
18th
Mexico rank
15th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Mexico
0102030199520072020

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 15.01 current US$ against 9.94 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 5.07 current US$.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.5 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Mexico ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 18th and Mexico ranks 15th of 51 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Mexico Difference Ahead
1990s 0.266 current US$ 2.57 current US$ 2.3 current US$ Mexico
2000s 6.86 current US$ 9.96 current US$ 3.1 current US$ Mexico
2010s 19.68 current US$ 22.37 current US$ 2.69 current US$ Mexico
2020s 9.94 current US$ 15.01 current US$ 5.07 current US$ Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Mexico?
Mexico, at 15.01 current US$ against 9.94 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mexico?
5.07 current US$, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mexico?
24 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mexico rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 18th and Mexico ranks 15th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead. Statizoid. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mexico/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 1,007 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed