Bosnia and Herzegovina vs China: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead

Bosnia and Herzegovina
9.94 current US$
in 2020
China
10.03 current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
18th
China rank
17th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • China
0102030199520072020

How they compare

China currently reports 10.03 current US$ against 9.94 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.09 current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1997 it was China ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 18th and China ranks 17th of 51 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina China Difference Ahead
1990s 0.266 current US$ 1.97 current US$ 1.7 current US$ China
2000s 6.86 current US$ 4.45 current US$ 2.41 current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 19.68 current US$ 10.37 current US$ 9.31 current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 9.94 current US$ 10.03 current US$ 0.0894 current US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead, Bosnia and Herzegovina or China?
China, at 10.03 current US$ against 9.94 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead between Bosnia and Herzegovina and China?
0.09 current US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and China?
24 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and China rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 18th and China ranks 17th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs China: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead. Statizoid. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-lead-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/china/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs China: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: lead (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 1,007 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed