Mongolia vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore

Mongolia
3,314 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sweden
2,218 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mongolia rank
2nd
Sweden rank
5th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore over time

  • Mongolia
  • Sweden
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k7.0k199520072020

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 3,314 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,218 real chained 2019 US$ in Sweden, a difference of 1,096 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.5 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sweden ahead.

Mongolia ranks 2nd and Sweden ranks 5th of 129 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 5,193 real chained 2019 US$ 6,590 real chained 2019 US$ 1,396 real chained 2019 US$ Sweden
2000s 4,844 real chained 2019 US$ 6,838 real chained 2019 US$ 1,994 real chained 2019 US$ Sweden
2010s 3,998 real chained 2019 US$ 5,551 real chained 2019 US$ 1,553 real chained 2019 US$ Sweden
2020s 3,314 real chained 2019 US$ 2,218 real chained 2019 US$ 1,096 real chained 2019 US$ Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore, Mongolia or Sweden?
Mongolia, at 3,314 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,218 real chained 2019 US$ in Sweden as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore between Mongolia and Sweden?
1,096 real chained 2019 US$, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Sweden?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mongolia and Sweden rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore?
Mongolia ranks 2nd and Sweden ranks 5th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore. Statizoid. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-iron-ore-real-chained-2019-us/mongolia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-iron-ore-real-chained-2019-us/mongolia/sweden/">Mongolia vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
129 places, 3,313 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed