Chile vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore

Chile
433.11 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa
502.86 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chile rank
15th
South Africa rank
13th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore over time

  • Chile
  • South Africa
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199520072020

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 502.86 real chained 2019 US$ against 433.11 real chained 2019 US$ in Chile, a difference of 69.75 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.

Chile ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 13th of 129 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 730.21 real chained 2019 US$ 1,455 real chained 2019 US$ 724.36 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2000s 636.65 real chained 2019 US$ 605.65 real chained 2019 US$ 31 real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2010s 513.53 real chained 2019 US$ 582.12 real chained 2019 US$ 68.59 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2020s 433.11 real chained 2019 US$ 502.86 real chained 2019 US$ 69.75 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore, Chile or South Africa?
South Africa, at 502.86 real chained 2019 US$ against 433.11 real chained 2019 US$ in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore between Chile and South Africa?
69.75 real chained 2019 US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Chile and South Africa rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore?
Chile ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 13th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore. Statizoid. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-iron-ore-real-chained-2019-us/chile/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-iron-ore-real-chained-2019-us/chile/south-africa/">Chile vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
129 places, 3,313 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed