Bosnia and Herzegovina vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore

Bosnia and Herzegovina
489.29 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa
502.86 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
14th
South Africa rank
13th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • South Africa
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199520072020

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 502.86 real chained 2019 US$ against 489.29 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 13.57 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 13th of 129 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 557.45 real chained 2019 US$ 1,455 real chained 2019 US$ 897.11 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2000s 526.14 real chained 2019 US$ 605.65 real chained 2019 US$ 79.51 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2010s 510.21 real chained 2019 US$ 582.12 real chained 2019 US$ 71.91 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2020s 489.29 real chained 2019 US$ 502.86 real chained 2019 US$ 13.57 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore, Bosnia and Herzegovina or South Africa?
South Africa, at 502.86 real chained 2019 US$ against 489.29 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore between Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Africa?
13.57 real chained 2019 US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Africa rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 13th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore. Statizoid. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-iron-ore-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-iron-ore-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/south-africa/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
129 places, 3,313 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed