Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Norway: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore

Bosnia and Herzegovina
489.29 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Norway
345.7 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
14th
Norway rank
17th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Norway
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 489.29 real chained 2019 US$ against 345.7 real chained 2019 US$ in Norway, a difference of 143.59 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.4 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Norway ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 14th and Norway ranks 17th of 129 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 557.45 real chained 2019 US$ 580.93 real chained 2019 US$ 23.47 real chained 2019 US$ Norway
2000s 526.14 real chained 2019 US$ 532.3 real chained 2019 US$ 6.16 real chained 2019 US$ Norway
2010s 510.21 real chained 2019 US$ 401.17 real chained 2019 US$ 109.03 real chained 2019 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 489.29 real chained 2019 US$ 345.7 real chained 2019 US$ 143.59 real chained 2019 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Norway?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 489.29 real chained 2019 US$ against 345.7 real chained 2019 US$ in Norway as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Norway?
143.59 real chained 2019 US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Norway?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Norway rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 14th and Norway ranks 17th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Norway: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore. Statizoid. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-iron-ore-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-iron-ore-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/norway/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Norway: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
129 places, 3,313 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed