Thailand vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore
Thailand
0.3931 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
0.6821 current US$
in 2008
Thailand rank
50th
Zimbabwe rank
48th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore over time
- Thailand
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.6821 current US$ against 0.3931 current US$ in Thailand, a difference of 0.289 current US$.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.7 times Thailand's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Thailand ahead.
Thailand ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 57 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Thailand | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4432 current US$ | 0.3618 current US$ | 0.0815 current US$ | Thailand |
| 2000s | 2.16 current US$ | 1.35 current US$ | 0.8152 current US$ | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore, Thailand or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.6821 current US$ against 0.3931 current US$ in Thailand as of 2008.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore between Thailand and Zimbabwe?
- 0.289 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2008.
- How do Thailand and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore?
- Thailand ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.