Romania vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore
Romania
0.7448 current US$
in 2007
Zimbabwe
0.6821 current US$
in 2008
Romania rank
47th
Zimbabwe rank
48th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore over time
- Romania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.7448 current US$ against 0.6821 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0627 current US$.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.52 current US$ | 0.3618 current US$ | 1.15 current US$ | Romania |
| 2000s | 0.6966 current US$ | 1.27 current US$ | 0.5708 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore, Romania or Zimbabwe?
- Romania, at 0.7448 current US$ against 0.6821 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2007.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore between Romania and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0627 current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2007.
- How do Romania and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore?
- Romania ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.