Greece vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore
Greece
160.36 current US$
in 2017
Tunisia
36.74 current US$
in 2020
Greece rank
26th
Tunisia rank
29th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore over time
- Greece
- Tunisia
How they compare
Greece currently reports 160.36 current US$ against 36.74 current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 123.62 current US$.
That makes Greece's figure about 4.4 times Tunisia's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Greece has been ahead every year.
Greece ranks 26th and Tunisia ranks 29th of 57 countries.
Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 29.13 current US$ | 4.74 current US$ | 24.39 current US$ | Greece |
| 2000s | 115.63 current US$ | 13.72 current US$ | 101.9 current US$ | Greece |
| 2010s | 293.96 current US$ | 23.91 current US$ | 270.05 current US$ | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore, Greece or Tunisia?
- Greece, at 160.36 current US$ against 36.74 current US$ in Tunisia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore between Greece and Tunisia?
- 123.62 current US$, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Tunisia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
- How do Greece and Tunisia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore?
- Greece ranks 26th and Tunisia ranks 29th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.