Bosnia and Herzegovina vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore

Bosnia and Herzegovina
681.08 current US$
in 2020
South Africa
630.64 current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
15th
South Africa rank
16th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • South Africa
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 681.08 current US$ against 630.64 current US$ in South Africa, a difference of 50.44 current US$.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 16th of 57 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 6.65 current US$ 17.84 current US$ 11.19 current US$ South Africa
2000s 299.32 current US$ 507.23 current US$ 207.9 current US$ South Africa
2010s 609.78 current US$ 780.32 current US$ 170.54 current US$ South Africa
2020s 681.08 current US$ 630.64 current US$ 50.44 current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore, Bosnia and Herzegovina or South Africa?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 681.08 current US$ against 630.64 current US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore between Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Africa?
50.44 current US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Africa rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 16th of 57 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore. Statizoid. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-iron-ore-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-iron-ore-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/south-africa/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: iron ore (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 1,098 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed