Saudi Arabia vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold

Saudi Arabia
168.92 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zambia
95.1 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Saudi Arabia rank
49th
Zambia rank
52nd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Zambia
100200300400500199520072020

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 168.92 real chained 2019 US$ against 95.1 real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia, a difference of 73.82 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.8 times Zambia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.

Saudi Arabia ranks 49th and Zambia ranks 52nd of 142 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 458.21 real chained 2019 US$ 331.67 real chained 2019 US$ 126.55 real chained 2019 US$ Saudi Arabia
2000s 338.35 real chained 2019 US$ 260.04 real chained 2019 US$ 78.31 real chained 2019 US$ Saudi Arabia
2010s 217.96 real chained 2019 US$ 149.85 real chained 2019 US$ 68.1 real chained 2019 US$ Saudi Arabia
2020s 168.92 real chained 2019 US$ 95.1 real chained 2019 US$ 73.82 real chained 2019 US$ Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold, Saudi Arabia or Zambia?
Saudi Arabia, at 168.92 real chained 2019 US$ against 95.1 real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold between Saudi Arabia and Zambia?
73.82 real chained 2019 US$, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Zambia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Saudi Arabia and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold?
Saudi Arabia ranks 49th and Zambia ranks 52nd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saudi Arabia vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold. Statizoid. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-gold-real-chained-2019-us/saudi-arabia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-gold-real-chained-2019-us/saudi-arabia/zambia/">Saudi Arabia vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
142 places, 3,663 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed