Philippines vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold

Philippines
90.57 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zambia
95.1 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Philippines rank
54th
Zambia rank
52nd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold over time

  • Philippines
  • Zambia
100200300400199520072020

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 95.1 real chained 2019 US$ against 90.57 real chained 2019 US$ in Philippines, a difference of 4.53 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Philippines ahead.

Philippines ranks 54th and Zambia ranks 52nd of 142 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 373.72 real chained 2019 US$ 331.67 real chained 2019 US$ 42.05 real chained 2019 US$ Philippines
2000s 245.07 real chained 2019 US$ 260.04 real chained 2019 US$ 14.98 real chained 2019 US$ Zambia
2010s 128.18 real chained 2019 US$ 149.85 real chained 2019 US$ 21.67 real chained 2019 US$ Zambia
2020s 90.57 real chained 2019 US$ 95.1 real chained 2019 US$ 4.54 real chained 2019 US$ Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold, Philippines or Zambia?
Zambia, at 95.1 real chained 2019 US$ against 90.57 real chained 2019 US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold between Philippines and Zambia?
4.53 real chained 2019 US$, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Zambia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Philippines and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold?
Philippines ranks 54th and Zambia ranks 52nd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-gold-real-chained-2019-us/philippines/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-gold-real-chained-2019-us/philippines/zambia/">Philippines vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
142 places, 3,663 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed