Papua New Guinea vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold

Papua New Guinea
3,244 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Suriname
14,580 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea rank
4th
Suriname rank
1st

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Suriname
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199520072020

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 14,580 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,244 real chained 2019 US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 11,336 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Suriname's figure about 4.5 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 4th and Suriname ranks 1st of 142 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 10,366 real chained 2019 US$ 35,784 real chained 2019 US$ 25,418 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2000s 6,144 real chained 2019 US$ 31,036 real chained 2019 US$ 24,891 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2010s 3,877 real chained 2019 US$ 21,007 real chained 2019 US$ 17,130 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2020s 3,244 real chained 2019 US$ 14,580 real chained 2019 US$ 11,336 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold, Papua New Guinea or Suriname?
Suriname, at 14,580 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,244 real chained 2019 US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold between Papua New Guinea and Suriname?
11,336 real chained 2019 US$, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Papua New Guinea and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold?
Papua New Guinea ranks 4th and Suriname ranks 1st of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold. Statizoid. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-gold-real-chained-2019-us/papua-new-guinea/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-gold-real-chained-2019-us/papua-new-guinea/suriname/">Papua New Guinea vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
142 places, 3,663 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed