Australia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold

Australia
7,505 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Suriname
14,580 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Australia rank
3rd
Suriname rank
1st

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold over time

  • Australia
  • Suriname
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199520072020

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 14,580 real chained 2019 US$ against 7,505 real chained 2019 US$ in Australia, a difference of 7,075 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.9 times Australia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 3rd and Suriname ranks 1st of 142 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 4,054 real chained 2019 US$ 35,784 real chained 2019 US$ 31,730 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2000s 5,053 real chained 2019 US$ 31,036 real chained 2019 US$ 25,983 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2010s 7,452 real chained 2019 US$ 21,007 real chained 2019 US$ 13,555 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2020s 7,505 real chained 2019 US$ 14,580 real chained 2019 US$ 7,075 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold, Australia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 14,580 real chained 2019 US$ against 7,505 real chained 2019 US$ in Australia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold between Australia and Suriname?
7,075 real chained 2019 US$, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold?
Australia ranks 3rd and Suriname ranks 1st of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-gold-real-chained-2019-us/australia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-gold-real-chained-2019-us/australia/suriname/">Australia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
142 places, 3,663 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed