Uruguay vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold
Uruguay
123.92 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
127.79 current US$
in 2020
Uruguay rank
55th
Zambia rank
53rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold over time
- Uruguay
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 127.79 current US$ against 123.92 current US$ in Uruguay, a difference of 3.87 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Uruguay ahead.
Uruguay ranks 55th and Zambia ranks 53rd of 96 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Uruguay averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uruguay | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.32 current US$ | 3.56 current US$ | 15.77 current US$ | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 53.36 current US$ | 21.84 current US$ | 31.52 current US$ | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 52.62 current US$ | 82.44 current US$ | 29.83 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 123.92 current US$ | 127.79 current US$ | 3.87 current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold, Uruguay or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 127.79 current US$ against 123.92 current US$ in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold between Uruguay and Zambia?
- 3.87 current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Zambia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2020.
- How do Uruguay and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold?
- Uruguay ranks 55th and Zambia ranks 53rd of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.