Serbia vs Thailand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold
Serbia
7.66 current US$
in 2016
Thailand
4.52 current US$
in 2016
Serbia rank
77th
Thailand rank
80th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold over time
- Serbia
- Thailand
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 7.66 current US$ against 4.52 current US$ in Thailand, a difference of 3.14 current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.7 times Thailand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 77th and Thailand ranks 80th of 96 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.26 current US$ | 10.59 current US$ | 5.68 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 18.69 current US$ | 9.81 current US$ | 8.88 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold, Serbia or Thailand?
- Serbia, at 7.66 current US$ against 4.52 current US$ in Thailand as of 2016.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold between Serbia and Thailand?
- 3.14 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Thailand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Serbia and Thailand rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold?
- Serbia ranks 77th and Thailand ranks 80th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.