Serbia vs Sierra Leone: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold
Serbia
7.66 current US$
in 2016
Sierra Leone
9.05 current US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
77th
Sierra Leone rank
76th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold over time
- Serbia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 9.05 current US$ against 7.66 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 1.39 current US$.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 77th and Sierra Leone ranks 76th of 96 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.26 current US$ | 2.78 current US$ | 13.48 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 18.69 current US$ | 2.85 current US$ | 15.84 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold, Serbia or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 9.05 current US$ against 7.66 current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold between Serbia and Sierra Leone?
- 1.39 current US$, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sierra Leone?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Serbia and Sierra Leone rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold?
- Serbia ranks 77th and Sierra Leone ranks 76th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.