Namibia vs Russia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold
Namibia
1,559 current US$
in 2020
Russia
1,491 current US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
12th
Russia rank
14th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold over time
- Namibia
- Russia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 1,559 current US$ against 1,491 current US$ in Russia, a difference of 68 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 12th and Russia ranks 14th of 96 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 3 and Russia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 158.04 current US$ | 59.79 current US$ | 98.25 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2000s | 282.88 current US$ | 131.63 current US$ | 151.25 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2010s | 554.86 current US$ | 564.53 current US$ | 9.67 current US$ | Russia |
| 2020s | 1,559 current US$ | 1,491 current US$ | 68.58 current US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold, Namibia or Russia?
- Namibia, at 1,559 current US$ against 1,491 current US$ in Russia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold between Namibia and Russia?
- 68 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Russia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Namibia and Russia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold?
- Namibia ranks 12th and Russia ranks 14th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.