Mozambique vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold
Mozambique
9.71 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
7.66 current US$
in 2016
Mozambique rank
75th
Serbia rank
77th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold over time
- Mozambique
- Serbia
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 9.71 current US$ against 7.66 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 2.05 current US$.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Mozambique ranks 75th and Serbia ranks 77th of 96 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.77 current US$ | 16.26 current US$ | 14.5 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 1.77 current US$ | 18.69 current US$ | 16.92 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold, Mozambique or Serbia?
- Mozambique, at 9.71 current US$ against 7.66 current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold between Mozambique and Serbia?
- 2.05 current US$, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mozambique and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold?
- Mozambique ranks 75th and Serbia ranks 77th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.