Guatemala vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold
Guatemala
7.36 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
7.66 current US$
in 2016
Guatemala rank
78th
Serbia rank
77th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold over time
- Guatemala
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 7.66 current US$ against 7.36 current US$ in Guatemala, a difference of 0.3 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 77th of 96 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.94 current US$ | 16.26 current US$ | 44.68 current US$ | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 31.41 current US$ | 18.69 current US$ | 12.72 current US$ | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold, Guatemala or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 7.66 current US$ against 7.36 current US$ in Guatemala as of 2016.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold between Guatemala and Serbia?
- 0.3 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Guatemala and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold?
- Guatemala ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 77th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.