Congo vs Italy: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold
Congo
3.35 current US$
in 2017
Italy
3.2 current US$
in 2011
Congo rank
84th
Italy rank
85th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold over time
- Congo
- Italy
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3.35 current US$ against 3.2 current US$ in Italy, a difference of 0.15 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Italy ahead.
Congo ranks 84th and Italy ranks 85th of 96 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Italy in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2145 current US$ | 0.2472 current US$ | 0.0327 current US$ | Italy |
| 2000s | 1.5 current US$ | 0.5867 current US$ | 0.9128 current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 5.52 current US$ | 2.57 current US$ | 2.96 current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold, Congo or Italy?
- Congo, at 3.35 current US$ against 3.2 current US$ in Italy as of 2017.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold between Congo and Italy?
- 0.15 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Italy?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2011.
- How do Congo and Italy rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold?
- Congo ranks 84th and Italy ranks 85th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.