Chile vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold
Chile
1,016 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
970.31 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
20th
Zimbabwe rank
22nd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold over time
- Chile
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Chile currently reports 1,016 current US$ against 970.31 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 45.69 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 96 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 394.32 current US$ | 94.15 current US$ | 300.18 current US$ | Chile |
| 2000s | 357.36 current US$ | 102.55 current US$ | 254.81 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 672.47 current US$ | 190.51 current US$ | 481.96 current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 1,016 current US$ | 970.31 current US$ | 45.39 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold, Chile or Zimbabwe?
- Chile, at 1,016 current US$ against 970.31 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold between Chile and Zimbabwe?
- 45.69 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold?
- Chile ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.