Chile vs Ghana: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold
Chile
1,016 current US$
in 2020
Ghana
1,172 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
20th
Ghana rank
17th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold over time
- Chile
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 1,172 current US$ against 1,016 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 156 current US$.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 20th and Ghana ranks 17th of 96 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 394.32 current US$ | 143.25 current US$ | 251.08 current US$ | Chile |
| 2000s | 357.36 current US$ | 116.9 current US$ | 240.46 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 672.47 current US$ | 425.97 current US$ | 246.5 current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 1,016 current US$ | 1,172 current US$ | 156.45 current US$ | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold, Chile or Ghana?
- Ghana, at 1,172 current US$ against 1,016 current US$ in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold between Chile and Ghana?
- 156 current US$, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ghana?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Ghana rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold?
- Chile ranks 20th and Ghana ranks 17th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.