Australia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold

Australia
10,054 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
19,848 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
3rd
Suriname rank
1st

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold over time

  • Australia
  • Suriname
010.0k20.0k30.0k199520072020

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 19,848 current US$ against 10,054 current US$ in Australia, a difference of 9,794 current US$.

That makes Suriname's figure about 2.0 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 3rd and Suriname ranks 1st of 96 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 320.05 current US$ 41.84 current US$ 278.22 current US$ Australia
2000s 659.08 current US$ 2,428 current US$ 1,769 current US$ Suriname
2010s 3,130 current US$ 14,256 current US$ 11,126 current US$ Suriname
2020s 10,054 current US$ 19,848 current US$ 9,795 current US$ Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold, Australia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 19,848 current US$ against 10,054 current US$ in Australia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold between Australia and Suriname?
9,794 current US$, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold?
Australia ranks 3rd and Suriname ranks 1st of 96 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-gold-current-us/australia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-gold-current-us/australia/suriname/">Australia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: gold (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
96 places, 2,157 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed