Papua New Guinea vs Poland: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper

Papua New Guinea
411.62 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Poland
399.32 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea rank
11th
Poland rank
12th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Poland
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 411.62 real chained 2019 US$ against 399.32 real chained 2019 US$ in Poland, a difference of 12.3 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 11th and Poland ranks 12th of 145 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 1,410 real chained 2019 US$ 244.8 real chained 2019 US$ 1,165 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 914.07 real chained 2019 US$ 350.54 real chained 2019 US$ 563.53 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 525.38 real chained 2019 US$ 353.44 real chained 2019 US$ 171.93 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 411.62 real chained 2019 US$ 399.32 real chained 2019 US$ 12.29 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper, Papua New Guinea or Poland?
Papua New Guinea, at 411.62 real chained 2019 US$ against 399.32 real chained 2019 US$ in Poland as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper between Papua New Guinea and Poland?
12.3 real chained 2019 US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Poland?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Papua New Guinea and Poland rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper?
Papua New Guinea ranks 11th and Poland ranks 12th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Poland: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper. Statizoid. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/papua-new-guinea/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-copper-real-chained-2019-us/papua-new-guinea/poland/">Papua New Guinea vs Poland: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: copper (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed